May 9
/
Cody Winniford
HemoDIEnamics Part 2
In part 1 I talked about catching shock early and making your big move before the patient loses their ability to compensate (and perhaps respond to resuscitation). Perhaps there is more to say about it rather than saying things like “aggressive” and “ big move.” Can you be too aggressive? Sure, there are a few clinical contexts where you can overshoot or push it too hard too fast. So to that point I’ve got a graduated response scheme for part 2.
The whole point of this series is to shift the mindset from looking for vitals to seeing the physiology, and acting on that physiology, in the compensated phase, so that the patient can stabilize and compensate longer. Ultimately, with the goal of surviving to the OR and beyond.
My Mindsets:
- Occult shock isn’t really occult if you know what to look for.
- Shock is shock, no matter what descriptor you put in front of it. Compensated or decompensated… it’s still SHOCK.
Here is how I approach it:
Phase 1: Identification of Occult Shock (The "Yellow"Zone)
The patient appears "stable" with a MAP > 65, but compensation is maxed. I don’t wait for shock to “show up.” I assume that it is there and I look for the cause. The numbers are there to support my assumption and guide me to look in certain places for problems I can fix.
Being successful in making things look better here does not mean that you wont have to escalate things later.
Clinical Indicators:
• Narrowing Pulse Pressure: < 30
• Rising Shock Index: 0.7 —> 0.9
• Trending EtCO2: A continuing downward trend without a respiratory etiology to cause it gets my attention.
• Physical Exam: Cool extremities, delayed capillary refill, anxious or restless behavior
Proactive Work:
1. Hemorrhage Control: Immediate reassessment of TQs, wound packing, or pelvic binders. Perhaps even unwrapping that AAJT and placing it.
2. Volume Optimization and Hemostatic Resus: Blood (if traumatic in nature), fluids if another cause of hypovolemia is suspected. TXA and perhaps some Ca+ if hemorrhage is the problem. Use volume to stabilize them as long as they are volume responsive. See: pulse pressure notes.
Buy back as much time as possible here, because once they turn that corner, it will be difficult to turn them around without much more volume than you have on hand.
Buy back as much time as possible here, because once they turn that corner, it will be difficult to turn them around without much more volume than you have on hand.
Phase 2: Impending Hemodynamic Collapse (The "Red" Zone)
Compensation has failed. They have either a.) run out of volume. OR b.) run out of endogenous catecholamines. Either way, you have your hands full. The resuscitation turns away from volume replacement and deliberately addressing causes of traumatic arrest and/or restoring forward flow of oxygenated blood. You have to move quickly, after 10:00 in this phase, hemodynamic collapse is a near certainty.
Clinical Indicators:
• Pathological Pulse Pressure: Either severely narrow (20) or widening with a crashing DBP (< 60 mmHg).
• Shock Index: > 1.0
• EtCO2: < 25
• The "Peri-Arrest" Threshold: SI > 1.0 + EtCO2 < 25. = 5:00 to take decisive, deliberate action… or make a big move.
HOTT Drill
When the patient's vitals near or cross these thresholds we have to take deliberate action. The HOTT drill comes from the trauma arrest literature that identifies hemorrhage, hypoxia, tension pneumothorax, and cardiac tamponade as the potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest from trauma. So if they’re reversible causes of arrest, then it simply makes sense to address them in the peri-arrest state. The HOTT drill should take no more than 5:00 to complete, the goal of which is to prevent an arrest.
1. Hypovolemia/hemorrhage:
One or two units is likely not going to get the patient out of trouble. 4-6 units is a better starting point if you have it. Reluctant to mention it here, but crystalloid may be all there is to provide volume to the patient and keep the heart going. I would rather accept the risks of using crystalloid and keep the heart pumping than try to restart a heart in arrest from hypovolemia.
2. Oxygen:
The airway is not the star of the show, but it has to be addressed… in a manner that poses the least amount of risk to impacting the hemodynamics. In my opinion, place an SGA and continue the resuscitation. Tube them after they have been stabilized to the degree they can physiologically support the procedure. The ventilation strategy has to be tight as well.
3. Tension Pneumothorax/Tamponade:
You must deliberately rule these out. Ultrasound is an incredibly important tool to have in this situation. I am not sure that empirically decompressing the chest and performing a pericardiocentesis is the right thing to do, simply because I cannot back that up with literature. Having said that, perhaps it does make sense to maintain a high index of suspicion(based on clinical assessment and the story), and make a move based on those findings. Perhaps even lowering your threshold for action makes some sense.
The Punchline
The punchline of this one is that there is a window of opportunity in which deliberate action can keep the patient from arresting. If you seize and maintain the initiative with the right actions at the right time, you have a better chance of staving off a deep and profound shock state.
References:
(Google Gemini was used to assist with the formatting and referencing of this article. At Pulse Check, we believe in high quality education. We sometimes use AI to help synthesize massive amounts of clinical data and to help structure our layouts, but every clinical take, every 'deep-dive' analogy, and every final word is vetted and written by a human paramedic. We use the tech so we can spend more time on the medicine. The conclusions here are wholly our own.)
1. Jouffroy R, Gilbert B, Tourtier JP, et al. Prehospital pulse pressure and mortality of septic shock patients cared for by a mobile intensive care unit. BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00864-0. PMID: 37626302; PMCID: PMC10464421.
2. Putowski Z, Teboul JL, Castro R, et al. Can we reliably use pulse pressure as a surrogate for stroke volume? Physiological background and potential clinical implications for shock resuscitation. Crit Care. 2025 Jun 19;29(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05490-9. PMID: 40537864; PMCID: PMC12178023.
3. Crager S. The physiology of hemodynamic collapse. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(4):S15-S16.
4. Koch E, Lovett S, Nghiem T, et al. Shock index in the emergency department: utility and limitations. Open Access Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 14;11:179-199. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S178358. PMID: 31616192; PMCID: PMC6698590.
5. Singh A, Ali S, Agarwal A, et al. Correlation of shock index and modified shock index with the outcome of adult trauma patients: a prospective study of 9860 patients. N Am J Med Sci. 2014 Sep;6(9):450-2. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.141632. PMID: 25317389; PMCID: PMC4193151.
6. Öztürk Örmeci G, Yiğit Ö, Eray O. Utility of ETCO2 to predict hemorrhagic shock in multiple trauma patients. Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;52(1):206-215. doi: 10.3906/sag-2103-206. Epub 2022 Feb 22. PMID: 36161601; PMCID: PMC10734833.
7. Kheng CP, Rahman NH. The use of end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring in patients with hypotension in the emergency department. Int J Emerg Med. 2012 Jul 24;5(1):31. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-31. PMID: 22828152; PMCID: PMC3585511.
8. Hunter CL, Silvestri S, Ralls G, et al. The sixth vital sign: prehospital end-tidal carbon dioxide predicts in-hospital mortality and metabolic disturbances. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;32(2):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.10.049. Epub 2013 Nov 4. PMID: 24332900.
9. Richard A, Johns J, Wolfe A, et al. Systolic Blood Pressure Threshold for HEMS-Witnessed Arrests. Air Med J. 2018 Mar-Apr;37(2):104-107. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2017.11.014. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PMID: 29478573.
10. Dietrich M, Weilbacher F, Katzenschlager S, Weigand MA, Popp E. Severe trauma associated cardiac failure. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 22;32(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01175-4. PMID: 38254167; PMCID: PMC10804718.
11.Sherren PB, Reid C, Habig K, Burns B. Algorithm for the resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest patients in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service. Crit Care. 2013;17(Suppl 2):P281. doi: 10.1186/cc12219. Epub 2013 Mar 19. PMCID: PMC3642597.
10. Dietrich M, Weilbacher F, Katzenschlager S, Weigand MA, Popp E. Severe trauma associated cardiac failure. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 22;32(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01175-4. PMID: 38254167; PMCID: PMC10804718.
11.Sherren PB, Reid C, Habig K, Burns B. Algorithm for the resuscitation of traumatic cardiac arrest patients in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service. Crit Care. 2013;17(Suppl 2):P281. doi: 10.1186/cc12219. Epub 2013 Mar 19. PMCID: PMC3642597.
Helpful links
Subscribe to our newsletter
Thank you!
Copyright © 2026
